|
We’ve all seen the headlines, “Ozone advisory. You are advised not to go outside, specially the old and young, due to high ozone smog levels”. That’s the headline, the sound bite that we remember. We’ve also heard ozone called a “toxic gas” by health professionals, seen it vilified in billboards asking us to “O-liminate Ozone” by filling up our cars at night rather of for the duration of hot summer days. Yet we’ve also heard that ozone is applied to purify municipal water, treat cancer in some countries of the world, and get rid of smoke and mold harm when employed by trained restoration contractors. So what gives? Is ozone smog, pollution, a toxic gas or is it a water and air cleaner? The answer to that question is more complex than a simple “yes” or “no”. Ozone, like oxygen, like water, like hydrogen or any other naturally occurring thing may be destructive or beneficial depending on how it is used. Many things that are “good” may kill us in excess. Water comes to mind. You’ve in all probability heard of humans dying from drinking too much water too fast yet staying the right way hydrated is necessary for good health. Does that make water “toxic”? Their is a long list of “good” things that in excess may kill us, and ozone is one of them. Everyone may agree that breathing high levels of ozone is damaging to our health, peculiarly our lungs. What in regards to breathing low levels of ozone? Can injecting little amounts of ozone into the air in truth advertize good health? The answer is yes according to studies conducted at the Academy of Medical Sciences in Russia, Two doctors and researchers, Dr. Gubernskii and Dr. Dmitriev found that 0.005ppm (parts per million) to 0.02 ppm of ozone added to normal indoor air with no ozone increased animals’ resistance to colds, infections, to toxic substances, and to oxygen deprivation. That’s a good thing! I quote, “A ordinary increase in the immune “biological potential” and the critical capacity of the lung function” was reported as to the reason why. Other doctors in Russia, where ozone is embraced and applied with a high success rate by the medical establishment, likewise performed tests utilizing less than.01 ppm of ozone in an air-conditioned office building to see the effects on the inhabitants. The tests revealed that “the office dwellers levels of oxygen in the blood increase comparatively speedily and remained at a higher levels for the duration of the experiment.” Since cancers can not survive oxygen rich environments in our body, increasing our bodies oxygen level is a very good thing. Russian doctors have also stated that: “Atmospheric ozone has a positive effect on animals and people. It is important to note it is positive effect on the breathing system, blood composition, arterial pressure, immune system, popular sentiment of well-being, and mental and physical work capability. The ozone-ion complex is a necessary element of fresh air that gives it a curative effect.” I guess these finding shouldn’t surprise any person since our bodies are made to handle oxygen rather efficiently, and the more oxygen we get, the better. This same study, featured in the Russian diary Priroda, likewise reported a immense decrease in complaints of stuffiness from the office occupants. (3.8 times less complaints). Yet another Russian study performed to see how adding little amounts of ozone to the air was at bettering indoor air quality in schools reported that respiratory-related diseases were drasti bettered after the ozone schemes were installed. The ozone concentration developed by the schemes was a mere 0.015 ppm (parts per million). Okay you’re thinking, that’s great! But how regarding a great deal of studies here at home that suggest low levels of ozone in the air promoted good health? Some publications have published studies showing the effectiveness of lower concentrations ozone (0.01 to 0.03 ppm) at removing odors and pollutants from our air tight structures. Some of these include the Refrigeration Service Engineers Society (RSES), U.S. Air Force technical publications, and Manufacturing Chemist. These studies nonetheless don’t get national coverage, for more or less apparent reason. We all recognise the power the International pharma drug and chemical cartels have over our elected officials, for better or for worse, such is the nature of our current system. WHAT EXACTLY IS OZONE? The short answer is three oxygen atoms that make up the o3 molecule known as ozone. In nature, ozone is produced in our atmosphere up high to invent an “ozone lawyer” to protects us from the destructive rays of the sun. Down low near earth, ozone is produced to oxidize and remove man made pollution from the air we breathe. I know, I know. The EPA’s spun is that ozone is in and of itself “smog”. The directory of the EPA was cited saying that she hopes someday “we may eliminate all ground ozone all together”. That would be great, but to do that we’d all have to drive bikes, live in tee-pees, refrain from making any fires to cook or food, and refrain from using electricity. In other words, even for the duration of the pre-man era there was ozone in the air from fires, and if by prospect her dream came true, we’d all die because we can’t stop naturally occurring forest fires and without ozone to break down the smoke, we’d all finally die. Besides, if there was no pollution in the air, mother nature wouldn’t come to the rescue and manufacture ozone to clean up our mess! Let me put this another way. If there is a lot of pollution, there will be a lot of ozone. Ozone is a blue gas, smog from industry and buses, cars, trucks, etc is a black-brown nasty color. Why call poor little Ms Ozone, the hard working cleaner that she is “smog” and not call the nasty brown and black “smog” emitted by industry smog instead? I know, I know, that’s a novel idea, but I’m sure that wouldn’t sit well with the Board of Directors of the major industries that are polluting our air, industries that feature former Presidents of the United States on their board of directors. If rather of “ozone alters” we were told precisely which toxic byproduct of industry was filling our air, and from which source, do you think that would put pressure on those polluters to clean up their act? Sure it would! But that would cost a lot of money, and make things more expensive, and make us less competitory around the world and lord knows we are already running an unsustainable national trade deficit. So ostensibly the powers that be met a long long time ago and came up with a plan to vilify ozone in order to draw attention away from the actual pollution culprits in order to protect those critical industries from any public outrage. Not cool, but the humans behind this misinformation do what they have to do to protect our big industries which after all are the central cohesive source of support and stability of our economy in the final analysis, for better or for worse. HOW IS OZONE CREATED? “Down low” near the earth, ozone is formulated when smog from industry, older buses, trucks, automobiles, etc reacts with the rays of the sun to “split” oxygen in the atmosphere. The free oxygen atom then adheres to other oxygen corpuscles to form the highly unstable molecule known as Ozone. The ozone will then quickly attack the man made pollution in earnest by sending the extra atom of oxygen off on a search and destruct the offensive toxic substances by breaking the chemical chains of the pollutant, thence breaking them down into littler molecules that are non-toxic. Ozone is likewise be produced by an electrical spark, such as by lightning, the suns rays, UV lamps in a sure wave length, and by high voltage ozone plates in ozone generators. HOW IS OZONE USED IN INDUSTRY? Ozone is presently being used in a number of industries with great success. As a water purifier, ozone is second to none. Unlike the very toxic and cancer causing cleaner Chlorine, which our government endorses wholeheartedly by the way, ozone breaks down toxic substances in the water and then reverting back to oxygen without creating any destructive byproducts. That can’t be said for Chlorine. When Chlorine in water comes in contact with feed for instance, toxic byproducts are devised which study after study suggest cause cancer. ” Surface water is being chlorinated to kill germs that might pollute it. Chlorine reacts with organic substances, causing formation of chlororganic substances (e.g. chloroform, chlorphenols, dioxins). Chloroform has long been known to be a potential cancer causative agent in animal experimentation. Extensive epidemiological studies on humane populations were capable to affirm the existence of a similar causative link in humans. A study done in Iowa, USA, involving 28,000 women showed a clear correlation among cancer incidence and water chlorination.” (1) This is just one of a great deal of studies that tie chlorine in water to cancer. To make matters worse, when we clean our fruits in veggies in chlorinated water, we develop cancer causing by-products: “Some of nature’s most valuable and necessary anti-cancer and anti-disease phytochemical nutrients which are commonly found in feed have been came across to form deadly cancer causing substances when consumed or combined with chlorinated tap water. This invention includes intimate foods including soy, fruits, vegetables, tea, a good deal of health products, and even a good deal of vitamins. Research has proven that these necessary nutrients are the precise same families of compounds, that even in infinitesimal amounts have been tormenting the water treatment and chlorine industries for years. Recently, a joint study was undertaken in Japan by exploration scientists at the National Institute of Health Sciences and Shizuoka Prefectural University. They determined that natural organic substances originating from foods, including fruits, soy, and green or black tea, react when tap water is chlorinated, forming dangerous cancer causing compounds. These deadly compounds have been named MX, which stands for “unknown mutagen”, and are similar to the already well-known and more effortlessly detected cancer causing THMs (trihalomethanes). The Japanese scientists distinctively noted that their studies showed that MX is invented by the reaction of chlorine with natural organic plant phytochemicals such as catechins, which are contained in tea, and flavonoids which are found in fruit. Since Japan has an exceedingly high consumption of tea, fruits, and soy products, it is easy to see how high amounts of residues from these foods would end up in their wastewater treatment and water recycling systems. Earlier studies by scientists in Finland in 1997 determined that MX is 170 times more deadly than other known toxic byproducts of chlorination, and was shown in laboratory studies to harm the thyroid gland as well as cause cancerous tumors.” (2) Recent studies by http://www.ewg.org, the Environmental Working Group found that nations municipal water furnishes are overwrought with pharmaceutical drugs and other destructive chemicals. Well, the water districts that use Chlorine anyway to disinfect their water supplies. However, the water districts which utilize ozone to disinfect the water were given a clean bill of health; no pharma drugs there! “In a German study7, granular activated carbon (GAC) and ozonation employed in a lab and in a water treatment plant, often in series, were very effective at removing carbamazepine, diclofenac and bezafibrate. The lab likewise showed that 3.0 milligrams per liter (mg/L) of ozone cut primidone levels by closely 90 percent. Although neither GAC nor ozonation at any concentration was entirely successful with clofibric acid separately, the two in combining cut levels of the drug to beneath the limits of detection for the duration of plant testing. Shane Snyder, exploration and development project manager for the Southern Nevada Water Authority, testified in mid-April to a US Senate subcommittee when it comes to the pharmaceuticals issue on behalf of the American Water Works Association (AWWA), the water utility trade group. In an consultation with Water Technology®, he said the powdered form of activated carbon may be even more effective if applied properly. He said ozone’s effectiveness is tied to it is capacity to chemically attack the pharmaceutical molecules. For example, it may oxidize dissimilar kinds of functional aromatic bonds (forces binding sure carbon-based atomic structures within molecules) in pharmaceuticals. In the German study, Ternes states that his exploration has shown ozone competent of without apparent effort oxidizing 90 percent of 51 dissimilar pharmaceuticals. It is specially effective with compounds with amine groups and phenolic hydroxyl groups.” Most humans don’t know that tap water holds recycled urine from the toilet, that the pharma drugs people pee out end up in the tap water they drink (unless their water is ozonated), nor that they get the phama drugs plus cancer causing agents if their water district uses Chlorine to sanitize their recycled toilet water, aka tap water. Too bad a lot of ex-Presidents of the USA sit on the Board of Directors of various huge chemical companies that make Chlorine, and the pharma drugs in question. What other industries, besides waste water management use ozone? Ozone is also used in the laundry industry to clean clothes without the use of harsh chemicals. In the feed industry, ozone is used to preserve feed without the use of artificial preservatives. Ozone kills the bacteria that breaks down feed and spoils it while not effecting the feed whatsoever. Ozone is employed by restoration contractors to re-mediate smoke, water, and mold damage. Crime Scene Cleanup companies use ozone generators to get rid of “dead smells” and to ruin and organic material left behind. Some hospitals use ozone generators before and after operations to disinfect the operating room of any bacteria, viruses, and to demolish any left behind organic material as well as to disinfect beds. This is just a partial list for the successful use of air and water ozone generators in industry today. For links to these industries, check out the link at the bottom titled: “Links, Info Supporting This Article”. It’s well beyond a foregone conclusion that water ozonation is beneficial on a great deal of dissimilar levels. We’ve likewise reviewed a few studies that suggest low levels of ozone in ambient air promotes good health. How may you use ozone safely and efficaciously to promote good health in your home? Here are a few suggestions: 1) Buy a “shock treatment” mercantile ozone generator and carry out regular “shock treatments” when not a single soul is home (adhere to all operational instructions) to disinfect your home and nip any potential difficultnesses (mold, surface viruses, etc) in the bud. 2) Buy a “repeat cycle timer” and place your ozone generator near the air return. Run your HVAC system in the “ON” position 24/7 and use a quality MERV 11 furnace filter (change monthly) to remove airborne dust and dander from your indoor air. Have the repeat cycle timer turn on for 5-6 seconds ever 4-5 minutes. Buy an ozone monitor to make sure the ozone level does not rise above.025 ppm, a low and conservative number that has been shown in some tests to advertize good health. (EPA exposure limit is.10 ppm) You’ll without delay detect your air smells fresher and cleaner, similar to the air after a thunderstorm. Thunder produces ozone by splitting oxygen in the air in the same way an ozone generator splits oxygen, with electricity. A side bonus, you’ll observe flying insects head for the hills or die, and turn right around when the chance presents itself to come inside your home. (They HATE even the lightest scent of ozone!) You’ll detect your kids get sick less often, you every one sleeps better at night. Most importantly, you’ll detect the ordinary health of everyone in your family improves over time when you provide low levels of ozone with lower dust levels due to running your HVAC fan 24/7. Of course when you undertake and tell your doctor this is because you’re running an ozone generator to give rise to low levels of ozone in your home, he or she will most likely tell you you’re nuts and that ozone is a toxic gas. But you’ll know better. References: 1. Chlorination, chlorination by-products, and cancer: a meta-analysis, American Journal of Public Health, 82(7): 955-63, 1992] 2. Christman, RF; Kronberg, K; Singh, R; Ball, LM; Johnson, DJ; Report 259 Identification of Mutagenic By-products from Aquatic Humic Chlorination; North Carolina State University |
Gas Saving Devices How To Find The Ones That Work
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.